?

Log in

No account? Create an account

[icon] generating errors, Kornell&Hays - Falling Short
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.

Tags:, , ,
Current Music:facebook occasionally provides brain food
Security:
Subject:generating errors, Kornell&Hays
Time:08:51 pm
Current Mood:thoughtfulthoughtful
Some of my old lab mates are getting some well-deserved press for their education research. Their message that students should be challenged is good and very worth reading and taking to heart.

But I would argue that their study doesn't support their claims that errors are not harmful. Specifically, I think if you delayed the test phase then the initially generated error would trump the later-learned correct answer. (As would be predicted by the NToD dynamics, and even Jost: the guessed-answer gets a bigger initial RS and SS boost from the potency of guessing, and it came first.) So, as per the UCPD training I used to do, you give the trainee a chance to guess but if they are about to produce an error, you step in with the correct information.

Also, their baseline comparison is off - sure generation produces better recall than passively provided answers, but how would it fare against the generation of correct vs incorrect information?

Note to self, what would Catherine Fritz think?
comments: talk to me Previous Entry Share Next Entry

[icon] generating errors, Kornell&Hays - Falling Short
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.